On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:29:51PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: >On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 07:36:47PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>>- What is the deal with the GGI license mentioned? > >I don't really know. The current patch has >+/* #include license.bsd */ >But if this imposes a problem due to the advertising clause, it's fine >with me to dual-license it BSD/GPL (or just GPL for that matter). I just looked again and there is no issue that i can see. QEMU as a whole is licensed under GPL, libqemu may be LGPL. Several parts of devices are under BSD (if used standalone, outside qemu, it seems). I've expanded the brief '#include license.bsd' by the whole blob with a note that * alternatively * you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. */ now, so that shouldn't be a real issue, i hope.
