On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 19 August 2012 12:23, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Ideally, yes, but qemu is full of devices that haven't yet made the leap >> to QOM. >> >> omap1 is particularly tricky because I don't actually have any test images >> for it, so refactoring it is a leap in the dark. [I've tried asking on this >> list >> if anybody had test images a couple of times without success.] > > As an aside, maybe we should just delete the omap1 code if we haven't > got any way of testing it?
Yes, for example start printing warnings when the machine is started to solicit new maintainers. We should apply the same logic elsewhere too. > > -- PMM >
