On 14 August 2012 19:27, Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>> The code to initialise the target_to_host_errno_table[] array was
>> accidentally inside the loop through checking and initialising all
>> the supported ioctls. This was harmless but meant that we reinitialised the
>> array several hundred times on startup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  linux-user/syscall.c |   10 +++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
>> index 3ba3ef5..1af68d2 100644
>> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
>> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
>> @@ -4606,6 +4606,11 @@ void syscall_init(void)
>>  #undef STRUCT
>>  #undef STRUCT_SPECIAL
>>
>> +    /* Build target_to_host_errno_table[] table from
>> +     * host_to_target_errno_table[]. */
>> +    for (i=0; i < ERRNO_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
>
> Please add spaces around '=' and braces.

I agree that might be nice but (a) this is just code motion (b) it's
a bit impolite to make review comments at the final pull request
stage rather than when the patches were posted on the list for
review some weeks ago.

-- PMM

Reply via email to