On 08/10/2012 08:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 10 August 2012 17:22, Igor Mitsyanko <i.mitsya...@samsung.com> wrote:
On 08/09/2012 03:54 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
--- a/vmstate.h
+++ b/vmstate.h
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_uint64;
extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_timer;
extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_buffer;
extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_unused_buffer;
+extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_bitmap;
#define type_check_array(t1,t2,n) ((t1(*)[n])0 - (t2*)0)
#define type_check_pointer(t1,t2) ((t1**)0 - (t2*)0)
@@ -411,6 +412,18 @@ extern const VMStateInfo vmstate_info_unused_buffer;
.flags = VMS_BUFFER, \
}
+/* _field_size should be a uint32_t field in the _state struct giving
the
"..should be an int32_t.."
Er, yes. This patch should probably go in as part of your series
to add save/load to sd.c -- could you just fix this when you resend
the patch as part of that, please?
thanks
-- PMM
sure
