Ping? Patchwork URL: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/172730/
let me know if you want a v2 patch rather than just hand-fixing
the signed-off-by line snafu.
thanks
-- PMM
On 23 July 2012 19:05, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> The definitions for the ioctl numbers TARGET_BLKBSZGET and
> TARGET_BLKBSZSET had the wrong size parameters (they are defined
> with size_t, not int, even though the ioctl implementations themselves
> read and write integers). Since commit 354a0008 we now have an
> ioctl wrapper definition for BLKBSZGET and so on an x86-64-to-x86-64
> linux-user binary we were triggering the mismatch warning in
> syscall_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell>
> ---
> linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> index a79b67d..0b239c4 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> @@ -832,8 +832,8 @@ struct target_pollfd {
> #define TARGET_BLKSECTGET TARGET_IO(0x12,103)/* get max sectors per request
> (ll_rw_blk.c) */
> #define TARGET_BLKSSZGET TARGET_IO(0x12,104)/* get block device sector size
> */
> /* A jump here: 108-111 have been used for various private purposes. */
> -#define TARGET_BLKBSZGET TARGET_IOR(0x12,112,int)
> -#define TARGET_BLKBSZSET TARGET_IOW(0x12,113,int)
> +#define TARGET_BLKBSZGET TARGET_IOR(0x12, 112, abi_ulong)
> +#define TARGET_BLKBSZSET TARGET_IOW(0x12, 113, abi_ulong)
> #define TARGET_BLKGETSIZE64 TARGET_IOR(0x12,114,abi_ulong)
> /* return device size in bytes
> (u64 *arg) */
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
>
