Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Markus Armbruster >>> <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Asking for "funny" memory sizes sometimes crashes for me. For instance >>>> -m 0.8 or the equivalent -m 838860b. -m 0.7 appears to work. >>>> >>>> Should we round memory sizes? How? Where? >>> >>> We had a discussion about this recently: >>> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-06/msg02800.html >> >> I missed that, thanks! >> >> Unfortunately, the thread petered out without a conclusion. What now? > > There's no patch to do the check in vl.c for 8k. Lacking the patch, we > don't know exactly what is the charge level of megaphone batteries: > like Schrödinger's cat, they may be dead or fully charged.
What would you like me to do? Round argument of -m up to next multiple of 8KiB?
