On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:03:20 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 26/07/2012 17:54, Markus Armbruster ha scritto: > > Unlike Anthony, I think this is a move in the right direction. > > Me too, but I would like to understand how it fits with the > qapi-schema-errors.json. Do we actually need a schema if the messages > are flat? Yes, we need it because we still an error object to obey (ie. the data member). But we're talking about dropping that, so it might be possible to kill the schema.
