Am 17.09.2007 um 14:18 schrieb Christian MICHON:
On 9/17/07, Philip Boulain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DON'T DO THIS KIND OF COMMIT AGAIN, PLEASE.
if we were using git (but you can do it locally anyway), you
would not
have these conflicts problems...
Maybe... but Savannah uses a CVS frontend, as far as I know...
Those are excuses.
So is a "you should have used X" argument. It doesn't invalidate the
point that the commit was disruptive, and merely acts as bait for the
grand old "version repository" flamewar.*
since I mentionned "you should have used Git", I'll repeat:
this commit was not disruptive to any of the Git users, and will
never be.
Evolve, or prepare to be assimilated into the Collective...
Both the qemu.org and the Savannah project page only mention CVS. If
there are better ways to get the code then inform your users how to
use that. Writing only of CVS and then telling people they should
have used git instead is pure nonsense. Face reality; this is not
some science-fiction movie.
Andreas
