On 2012-07-25 17:56, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 25 July 2012 16:55, Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 07/25/2012 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> We don't have a synchronous function anymore, it's part of the pre-run >>> code of x86 IIRC. >> >> Right. There's a DPRINTF() there that talks about injection, too. So I >> think this patch can be dropped. > > The main purpose of the patch is to remove 'irqchip' from the > function name, because the function isn't restricted to use > with in-kernel irqchips.
Hmm, what was question again? Ah: Do we have an arch that implements it without providing a (logical) irqchip? At least at this time (including ARM)? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
