On 8 July 2012 11:59, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote: > Am 08.07.2012 12:01, schrieb Peter Maydell: >> On 8 July 2012 10:55, Lluís Vilanova <vilan...@ac.upc.edu> wrote: >>> Wouldn't it be better to use "unsigned int" instead on all the "start" >>> and "length" arguments? >> >> See the arguments about this on one of the previous patch series: >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-06/msg04304.html
> I just read that arguments and now agree with Blue and with > Lluís that 'unsigned' would be better. ...whereas I still agree with Markus (and with the people who wrote the Linux kernel bitops functions that we borrowed elsewhere in bitops.h) that we should be using plain 'int'. -- PMM
