On 2012-06-25 12:15, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-06-25 10:57, Avi Kivity wrote: >> The repetitiveness of this code suggests a different way of doing this: >> make every API call be its own subtransaction and perform the flush in >> memory_region_begin_transaction() (maybe that's the answer to my >> question above). > > So you want me to wrap the core of those services in > begin/commit_transaction instead? Just to be sure I got the idea.
What we would lose this way (transaction_commit) is the ability to skip updates on !mr->enabled. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
