Am 21.06.2012 02:21, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite: > Ping! > > Id really appreciate some input on this issue (rather than going ahead > and doing it to discover that someone disagrees with the approach). > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite > <peter.crosthwa...@petalogix.com> wrote: >> So here are the nitty-gritty details around the pending QOM stuff: >> >> Anthony is currently overhauling QBus, and im guessing the SSI bus is >> part of that? qom-next stable enough in this area to look at or not?
qom-next has been fully merged into qemu.git now, so please do not base any work on the stale branch. >> Also Anthony mentioned recently some GPIO refactoring stuff Guess you're referring to the "Pin" series. That was waiting on the QBus merge. Now it's probably been held up by the various Makefile fires. ;) Andreas >> - Are >> GPIOs on multiple levels of abstraction supported yet? IE if I have a >> SPI GPIO device, I need a GPIO on the SSISlave layer but also GPIOs on >> my (concrete) device layer. I know this currently doesnt work cos of >> qdev but thats going away right? >> >> Regards, >> Peter -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
