On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:57:44PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 20.06.2012 16:24, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > delete mode 100644 ui/vnc-jobs-async.c > > delete mode 100644 ui/vnc-jobs-sync.c > > create mode 100644 ui/vnc-jobs.c > > Is there a reason to rename vnc-jobs-foo.c to vnc-jobs.c ?
The corresponding header file is vnc-jobs.h, and since we only have one impl of it now, using the same name is normal practice. > I'd leave it alone at this stage, omiting just the rename... I disagree, GIT handles renames like this fine, so there's no reason not to do this. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
