On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de> wrote:
> Am 19.06.2012 04:31, schrieb Scott Wood:
>
>> If tci_out_label is called in the context of tcg_gen_code_search_pc, we
>> could be overwriting an already patched relocation with zero -- and not
>> repatch it because the set_label is past search_pc, causing a QEMU crash
>> when it tries to branch to a zero label.
>>
>> Not writing anything to the relocation area seems to be in line with what
>> other backends do from the couple I looked at (x86, ppc).
>
>
> Thanks, this might fix a crash which I have seen from time to time.
> I'll run tests as soon as possible.
>
> Could you please also look at the other backends?
>
> I saw from git history that ppc once had the same bug.
> The sparc backend (and maybe others) might still have it.
Confirmed for Sparc.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan W.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood<scottw...@freescale.com>
>> ---
>> tcg/tci/tcg-target.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tcg/tci/tcg-target.c b/tcg/tci/tcg-target.c
>> index 453f187..3c6b0f5 100644
>> --- a/tcg/tci/tcg-target.c
>> +++ b/tcg/tci/tcg-target.c
>> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static void tci_out_label(TCGContext *s, TCGArg arg)
>> assert(label->u.value);
>> } else {
>> tcg_out_reloc(s, s->code_ptr, sizeof(tcg_target_ulong), arg, 0);
>> - tcg_out_i(s, 0);
>> + s->code_ptr += sizeof(tcg_target_ulong);
I like this fix. Other similar fixes rewrote the fixed part of the
opcode and not the label, but the fixed part may cross byte
boundaries.
>> }
>> }
>>
>
