On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:22:43AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 06/18/2012 09:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:58:33PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >>So we need to fix our topological representation of platform devices > >>before we start adding more complex chipsets. Otherwise, we're > >>going to end up in a bad situation in the near future. > > > >OTOH more in-tree examples especially for x86 will keep us > >honest: help make sure abstractions make sense, > >and prevent people from special casing piix because > >this is the prevalent platform for kvm ATM. > > Yes, more in-tree *correct* examples. I'm very much in favor of merging q35. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori
But is there a way to build a correct chipset right now? Or is this blocked waiting for more infrastructure to get merged? -- MST
