On 2012-06-18 09:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2012-06-14 23:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:15:42PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: >>>> v3: >>>> - more patches, smaller diff, must be headed in the right direction >>>> - macros for all hardcoded values in msix_init_exclusive_bar >>>> - fold msix_add_config into msix_init allowing less churn to moving >>>> around msix_uninit >>>> - note native endian bug >>>> - split msix_mmio_read move to separate patch >>>> - split changing return value of msix_uninit to separate patch >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Alex >>> >>> Thanks, applied all. >>> Will test/push next week. >> >> Could you publish your queue? I'd like to rebase my missing bits. >> >> Thanks, >> Ja >> > > Will do. FYI Anthony said on irc he objects to the caching approach, > asked for more time to review it all. Maybe we'll have to > go back to your original idea of a special API just for > assigned devices.
Yes, we can still add caching on top. I really like to have some hook upstream soon as time is running out quickly for the 1.2 merge window and there is still some work to do on the qemu-kvm side. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
