On 12/06/12 13:57, Alexander Graf wrote: > Since it lives in an s390 specific branch, the function name should probably > be called s390 specific. If we ever need another architecture to have a kvm > specific ram allocator, we can make it generic when that time comes. Until > then, let's treat s390 as the oddball it is :). > > Apart from that, this approach looks a lot nicer, yes.
But then I have to have a *s390* function declared in kvm.h and your other comment hits me. You got me in a trap here, heh? ;-)
