> > Ive had a brief look at the refactorings on qom-next, I notice that > > busses are now just children of the parent object TYPE_BUS. > > Essentially for point-to-point links this means that link itself > > has a QOM object. So for finer clarification, for new busses should or > > should I not have an object (whether it inherit TYPE_BUS or some > > other parent) for the link itself? Or should The master device interface > > directly with its slave? Im thinking the latter, no need for an > > object for a trivial point-to-point link.
I think AXI counts as a point-to-point link, so no bus. In my prop-ptr branch you can find some code (untested beyond compilation) that tried to model AXI using interfaces (git://github.com/pbonzini/qemu.git). I don't know much about AXI, so I tried to reverse engineer a decent model from what was done without QOM. Paolo
