On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 09:02 -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Since PCI 2.3, this bit is mandatory, and it should be independent of > the masking bit. The question is, if your device is supposed to support > 2.3, thus is just buggy,
It's a PCI Express device :-) > or if our detection algorithm is unreliable. It > basically builds on the assumption that, if we can flip the mask bit, > the feature should be present. I guess that is the best we can do. Maybe > we can augment this with a blacklist of devices that "support" flipping > without actually providing the feature. Cheers, Ben.
