Il 31/05/2012 15:49, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: >> Seriously? The natural thing to do is -qmp stdio, and I don't read any >> wikis for that. >> >> It's nice that you can get some kind of usability by typing in long >> network addresses or path names and hacking a rlwrap around it (didn't >> know this one yet), but it's not stuff I want to deal with. It should >> just work. > > I'm not opposed to having this somewhere else, but adding a crude hack down > QMP low-levels just to have readline support while the same functionality > can be achieved by using a simple tool doesn't make much sense to me.
We can at least clean up the code so that it doesn't look like a hack, and so that there is limited or no duplication between HMP and QMP code. > Actually, rlwrap supports more features than our NIH readline implementation. For HMP, it doesn't support completion. Paolo
