Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 05/09/2012 10:12 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 9 May 2012 15:01, Jim Meyering<j...@meyering.net> wrote: >>>> From 402100deb7e27b1d7ac619ebac963f861fae91b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: Jim Meyering<meyer...@redhat.com> >>>> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 18:34:26 +0200 >>>> Subject: [PATCH] linux-user: remove two unchecked uses of strdup >>>> >>>> Remove two uses of strdup (use g_path_get_basename instead), >>>> and add a comment that this strncpy use is ok. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering<meyer...@redhat.com> >>> >>> This version >>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell<peter.mayd...@linaro.org> >>> >>> but you'll need to retransmit it (presumably as part of a v2 >>> of this series) so it is in the proper format for a patch email >>> (otherwise all the conversational chatter ends up in the git >>> commit message). >> >> Thanks again. >> I'm amending to reflect ACKs and Reviewed-by: comments as they come in, >> as well as corrections like yours. >> >> I expect to repost the whole series (or any subset) when appropriate. >> Or I can push it to a publicly-accessible repository somewhere. > > Has this gotten reposted? I don't see a new version on the list.
Hi Anthony, I've reposted (as V2, V3, etc.) any individual patch that required revision, but have not reposted the series. I would have reposted, but I recall someone saying that their tools managed quite well with the one-off reposts. Would you like me to repost just this one or the whole 22-patch series?
