Am 10.09.2025 um 17:16 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
> 
>  Hi,
> 
> when running "./check -luks" in the qemu-iotests directory,
> some tests are failing for me:
> 
> 295 296 inactive-node-nbd luks-detached-header
> 
> Is that a known problem already?

Not to me anyway.

> FWIW, 295 is failing with the following output:
> 
> 295   fail       [17:03:01] [17:03:17]   15.7s                failed, exit 
> status 1
> [...]
> +EWARNING:qemu.machine.machine:qemu received signal 6; command: 
> "/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/qemu-system-x86_64 -display none -vga none 
> -chardev socket,id=mon,fd=5 -mon chardev=mon,mode=control -chardev 
> socket,id=qtest,fd=3 -qtest chardev:qtest -accel qtest -nodefaults -display 
> none -accel qtest"
> +EEWARNING:qemu.machine.machine:qemu received signal 6; command: 
> "/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/qemu-system-x86_64 -display none -vga none 
> -chardev socket,id=mon,fd=6 -mon chardev=mon,mode=control -chardev 
> socket,id=qtest,fd=3 -qtest chardev:qtest -accel qtest -nodefaults -display 
> none -accel qtest"
> +EEWARNING:qemu.machine.machine:qemu received signal 6; command: 
> "/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/qemu-system-x86_64 -display none -vga none 
> -chardev socket,id=mon,fd=10 -mon chardev=mon,mode=control -chardev 
> socket,id=qtest,fd=3 -qtest chardev:qtest -accel qtest -nodefaults -display 
> none -accel qtest"
> +E
> [...]
> 
> etc.
> 
> 296 looks very similar (also a "qemu received signal 6" error),
> but the others look like this:

When it gets signal 6 (i.e. SIGABRT), that usually means that you should
have a look at the coredump.

> inactive-node-nbd   fail       [17:13:56] [17:14:04]   7.5s                 
> failed, exit status 1
> --- /home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/inactive-node-nbd.out
> +++ 
> /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/luks-file-inactive-node-nbd/inactive-node-nbd.out.bad
> @@ -1,239 +1,64 @@
>  Preparing disk...
>  Launching VM...
> -{"execute": "nbd-server-start", "arguments": {"addr": {"data": {"path": 
> "SOCK_DIR/PID-nbd.sock"}, "type": "unix"}}}
> -{"return": {}}
> +ERROR:qemu.qmp.qmp_client.qemu-223907:Failed to receive Greeting: EOFError
> +ERROR:qemu.qmp.qmp_client.qemu-223907:Failed to establish session: EOFError
> +Traceback (most recent call last):
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/python/qemu/qmp/protocol.py", line 425, in 
> _session_guard
> +    await coro
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/python/qemu/qmp/qmp_client.py", line 250, in 
> _establish_session
> +    self._greeting = await self._get_greeting()
> +                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/python/qemu/qmp/qmp_client.py", line 270, in 
> _get_greeting
> +    msg = await self._recv()
> +          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/python/qemu/qmp/protocol.py", line 1009, in 
> _recv
> +    message = await self._do_recv()
> +              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/python/qemu/qmp/qmp_client.py", line 402, in 
> _do_recv
> +    msg_bytes = await self._readline()
> +                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/python/qemu/qmp/protocol.py", line 977, in 
> _readline
> +    raise EOFError
> +EOFError

Not sure what this is. It looks like the QEMU process failed to start,
maybe it didn't like some command line option. I would expect an error
message on stderr, but I'm not sure if qemu-iotests automatically
displays that in such cases. I thought that yes, but maybe I'm confusing
it with a different case.

> luks-detached-header   fail       [17:15:26] [17:15:38]   12.2s               
>  failed, exit status 1
> --- /home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/luks-detached-header.out
> +++ 
> /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/luks-file-luks-detached-header/luks-detached-header.out.bad
> @@ -1,5 +1,55 @@
> -..
> +EE
> +======================================================================
> +ERROR: test_detached_luks_header 
> (__main__.TestDetachedLUKSHeader.test_detached_luks_header)
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +Traceback (most recent call last):
> +  File 
> "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/tests/luks-detached-header", line 
> 139, in setUp
> +    res = qemu_img_create(
> +          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line 278, in 
> qemu_img_create
> +    return qemu_img('create', *args)
> +           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line 261, in 
> qemu_img
> +    return qemu_tool(*full_args, check=check, combine_stdio=combine_stdio)
> +           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +  File "/home/thuth/devel/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line 241, in 
> qemu_tool
> +    raise VerboseProcessError(
> +qemu.utils.VerboseProcessError: Command 
> '('/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/qemu-img', 'create', '-f', 'luks', '-o', 
> 'iter-time=10', '-o', 'key-secret=sec0', '-o', 'detached-header=true', 
> '--object', 'secret,id=sec0,data=foo', 
> '/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/luks-file-luks-detached-header/detached_header.img2')'
>  returned non-zero exit status 1.
> +  ┏━ output ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
> +  ┃ Formatting '/home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/l
> +  ┃ uks-file-luks-detached-header/detached_header.img2', fmt=luks
> +  ┃ size=-1 key-secret=sec0 iter-time=10 detached-header=true
> +  ┃ qemu-img: /home/thuth/tmp/qemu-build/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/luk
> +  ┃ s-file-luks-detached-header/detached_header.img2: Parameter
> +  ┃ 'detached-header' is unexpected
> +  ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

This one is surprising. I don't think anything relevant in the luks
driver has changed since the test was introduced. At the same time, the
code clearly has a problem when it tries to convert a QemuOpts
containing a "detached-header" option into a QAPI object when the schema
doesn't even have this option. Was this broken from the beginning? Would
have been for a year and half.

Kevin


Reply via email to