On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 19:06, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 at 10:01, Corvin Köhne <corvin.koe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Corvin Köhne <c.koe...@beckhoff.com>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Beckhoff has build a board, called CX7200, based on the Xilinx Zynq A9
> > platform. This commit series adds the Beckhoff CX7200 as new board variant 
> > to
> > QEMU.
> >
> > The emulation is able to successfully boot an CX7200 image. The image 
> > includes
> > some self tests executed on every boot. Only the cache self test fails due 
> > to
> > QEMU emulating the cache as always being coherent. The self tests include 
> > f.e.:
> >
> > * Network
> > * Flash
> > * CCAT DMA + EEPROM [1]
> > * TwinCAT (Beckhoff's automation control software [2])
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/beckhoff/ccat
> > [2] https://www.beckhoff.com/en-us/products/automation/
> >
> > YannickV (14):
> >   hw/timer: Make frequency configurable
> >   hw/timer: Make PERIPHCLK period configurable
> >   hw/dma/zynq-devcfg: Handle bitstream loading via DMA to 0xffffffff
> >   hw/arm/zynq-devcfg: Prevent unintended unlock during initialization
> >   hw/dma/zynq: Ensure PCFG_DONE bit remains set to indicate PL is in
> >     user mode
> >   hw/dma/zynq-devcfg: Simulate dummy PL reset
> >   hw/dma/zynq-devcfg: Indicate power-up status of PL
> >   hw/dma/zynq-devcfg: Fix register memory
> >   hw/misc: Add dummy ZYNQ DDR controller
> >   hw/misc/zynq_slcr: Add logic for DCI configuration
> >   hw/misc: Add Beckhoff CCAT device
> >   hw/block/m25p80: Add HAS_SR_TB flag for is25lp016d
> >   hw/arm: Add new machine based on xilinx-zynq-a9 for Beckhoff CX7200
> >   docs/system/arm: Add support for Beckhoff CX7200
>
> This patchset is on my list to review. As an initial request,
> for a new board could we have a test in tests/functional/
> please?

I've also now reviewed the two initial generic-arm patches
and the ones where you add new device models. I had a
quick scan through the bug fix patches to the existing
zynq devices but I'd appreciate it if the Xilinx folks
could review those ones.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to