On Fri, 2025-08-08 at 09:07 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > On 06.08.2025 23:46, Miles Glenn wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-08-05 at 22:07 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > ... > > > These seem to be interesting to have : > > > > > > ppc/xive2: Fix treatment of PIPR in CPPR update > > > ppc/xive2: Fix irq preempted by lower priority group irq > > > ppc/xive: Fix PHYS NSR ring matching > > > ppc/xive2: fix context push calculation of IPB priority > > > ppc/xive2: Remote VSDs need to match on forwarding address > > > ppc/xive2: Fix calculation of END queue sizes > > > ppc/xive: Report access size in XIVE TM operation error logs > > > ppc/xive: Fix xive trace event output > > > > I'm still not sure that the benefit is worth the effort, but I > > certainly don't have a problem with them being backported if someone > > has the desire and the time to do it. > > I mentioned already that 10.0 series will (hopefully) be LTS series. > At the very least, it is what we'll have in the upcoming debian > stable release (trixie), which will be stable for the next 2 years. > Whenever this is important to have working Power* support in debian - > I don't know. > > All the mentioned patches applied to 10.0 branch cleanly (in the > reverse order, from bottom to top), so there's no effort needed > to back-port them. And the result passes at least the standard > qemu testsuite. So it looks like everything works as intended. > > Please keep qemu-stable@ in Cc for other fixes which you think are > of interest for older/stable series of qemu. > > Thanks, > > /mjt
Will do, and thanks for doing the backporting, Michael! -Glenn
