On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
I confirm that I expected g2h() to be completely removed in case the Linux
user access API is used.
I agree too that it should not be used. I'm testing ARM on x86_64, and
used it in a few places to clean up some warnings. The real fix is to
change what I was doing to not need this asignment anyway. I will take
another look at how to bury this part in the copy* interfaces.
Would it be OK to use g2h() inside the implementation of copy* ?
Since you agree for the copying interface, I suggest to convert all the code
to it.
OK, I'll continue in this direction, after taking a fresh look at what I
did yesterday.
Thanks for the feedback.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solutions Architect http://www.c2.net/
1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149
