On 05/22/2012 02:34 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 21.05.2012 20:20, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>> Am 14.05.2012 23:22, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>> Am 14.05.2012 21:54, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 10.05.2012 02:13, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>>>>>>> Andreas Färber (74):
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> target-sparc: Let cpu_sparc_init() return SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>> sun4m: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>> sun4m: Pass SPARCCPU to {main,secondary}_cpu_reset()
>>>>>>>> sun4u: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>> sun4u: Let cpu_devinit() return SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>> sun4u: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData
>>>>>>>> leon3: Use cpu_sparc_init() to obtain SPARCCPU
>>>>>>>> leon3: Store SPARCCPU in ResetData
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Forgot to mention the bsd-user patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kill off cpu_state_reset()
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ping! Blue, can you ack please?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise the patches look pretty safe ("if it compiles, it works").
>>>
>>> Was I supposed to interpret that as an Acked-by? ;)
>>
>> No, but you may do so if it compiles. ;-)
>
> Joking, are we? My cover letter indicated pretty clearly on what
> platforms I had already compile-tested on, and that meant each patch.
> I had also run `make check` on each and the sparc test image for sun4m,
> HelenOS for sun4u and "crible" for leon3.
>
> Applied the remainder of the series to qom-next:
> http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/shortlog/refs/heads/qom-next
>
> Tristan/Fabien, could you please submit a patch to document the Leon3
> machine in MAINTAINERS? No one got cc'ed on those two patches. Thanks.
>
OK, I'll send a patch.
--
Fabien Chouteau
