Hi, On 06/06/2025 12:04 pm, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: > Caution: External email. Do not open attachments or click links, unless this > email comes from a known sender and you know the content is safe. > > > Introduce a new structure VTDHostIOMMUDevice which replaces > HostIOMMUDevice to be stored in hash table. > > It includes a reference to HostIOMMUDevice and IntelIOMMUState, > also includes BDF information which will be used in future > patches. > > Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.d...@intel.com> > --- > hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 7 +++++++ > include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 2 +- > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h > index 2cda744786..18bc22fc72 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #ifndef HW_I386_INTEL_IOMMU_INTERNAL_H > #define HW_I386_INTEL_IOMMU_INTERNAL_H > #include "hw/i386/intel_iommu.h" > +#include "system/host_iommu_device.h" > > /* > * Intel IOMMU register specification > @@ -608,4 +609,10 @@ typedef struct VTDRootEntry VTDRootEntry; > /* Bits to decide the offset for each level */ > #define VTD_LEVEL_BITS 9 > > +typedef struct VTDHostIOMMUDevice { > + IntelIOMMUState *iommu_state; > + PCIBus *bus; > + uint8_t devfn; > + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod; > +} VTDHostIOMMUDevice; > #endif > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h > index e95477e855..50f9b27a45 100644 > --- a/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h > +++ b/include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ struct IntelIOMMUState { > /* list of registered notifiers */ > QLIST_HEAD(, VTDAddressSpace) vtd_as_with_notifiers; > > - GHashTable *vtd_host_iommu_dev; /* HostIOMMUDevice */ > + GHashTable *vtd_host_iommu_dev; /* VTDHostIOMMUDevice */ > > /* interrupt remapping */ > bool intr_enabled; /* Whether guest enabled IR */ > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > index c42ef83ddc..796b71605c 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > @@ -281,7 +281,10 @@ static gboolean vtd_hiod_equal(gconstpointer v1, > gconstpointer v2) > > static void vtd_hiod_destroy(gpointer v) > { > - object_unref(v); > + VTDHostIOMMUDevice *vtd_hiod = v; > + > + object_unref(vtd_hiod->hiod); > + g_free(vtd_hiod); > } > > static gboolean vtd_hash_remove_by_domain(gpointer key, gpointer value, > @@ -4397,6 +4400,7 @@ static bool vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void > *opaque, int devfn, > HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, Error **errp) > { > IntelIOMMUState *s = opaque; > + VTDHostIOMMUDevice *vtd_hiod; > struct vtd_as_key key = { > .bus = bus, > .devfn = devfn, > @@ -4413,6 +4417,12 @@ static bool vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void > *opaque, int devfn, > return false; > } > > + vtd_hiod = g_malloc0(sizeof(VTDHostIOMMUDevice)); > + vtd_hiod->bus = bus; > + vtd_hiod->devfn = (uint8_t)devfn; > + vtd_hiod->iommu_state = s; > + vtd_hiod->hiod = hiod; > + > if (!vtd_check_hiod(s, hiod, errp)) {
Shouldn't we free vtd_hiod here? > vtd_iommu_unlock(s); > return false; > @@ -4423,7 +4433,7 @@ static bool vtd_dev_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void > *opaque, int devfn, > new_key->devfn = devfn; > > object_ref(hiod); > - g_hash_table_insert(s->vtd_host_iommu_dev, new_key, hiod); > + g_hash_table_insert(s->vtd_host_iommu_dev, new_key, vtd_hiod); > > vtd_iommu_unlock(s); > > -- > 2.34.1 >