On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 04:43:40PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 11:33:14AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > 
> > Now I think I know part of what I've missed: I used to think the "config"
> > of per-QMP-migrate-command can be totally temporary for a specific
> > migration request, but then we need another MigrationState.parameters_2 to
> > cache the old or vice versa; that's probably not necessary.  Now I think it
> > makes sense to overwrite any settings directly, hence I think I changed my
> > mind on question (1), YES is fine here.
> > 
> > For (2), why it would introduce any uncertainty for mgmt?
> > 
> > If the mgmt app can both: (1) query from qapi schema knowing all the
> > parameters supported, then (2) specify all the parameters in QMP migrate's
> > "option" parameter.  Then it's literally overwritting all the parameters,
> > so it's predictable with or without completely removing global settings as
> > an idea?
> 
> That is relying on the mgmt app specifiying absolutely every config
> parameter that exists. If they miss anything, then the behaviour is
> not well defined, as external global state still affects things.
> 
> This is the same situation we already have with migrate-set-parameter,
> where mgmt apps have to know to call migrate-set-parameter over & over
> with every possible parameter to get back to a well known starting point.
> 
> The command needs to run with the parameters provided in 'config' and
> no external global state, whether from -global or any prior call of
> migrate-set-parameter

So libvirt does not probe the qapi schema for all possible parameters?  Why
not do that once on QEMU boot up, then when migration is needed use a
sequence of commands to make sure everything will be setup before
"migrate"?  It'll definitely take a few rounds of QMP commands, but the
core issue is whether there can be any real atomic issues of that.

Just to say, I still think having "option" is a fine idea at least, but I'm
really curious on whether there's any real issue even without it.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu


Reply via email to