Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> writes: > On 2025/06/05 20:57, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> writes: >> >>> On 2025/06/03 20:01, Alex Bennée wrote: >>>> QOM objects can be embedded in other QOM objects and managed as part >>>> of their lifetime but this isn't the case for >>>> virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region. However before we can split it out we >>>> need some other way of associating the wider data structure with the >>>> memory region. >>>> Fortunately MemoryRegion has an opaque pointer. This is passed down >>>> to >>>> MemoryRegionOps for device type regions but is unused in the >>>> memory_region_init_ram_ptr() case. Use the opaque to carry the >>>> reference and allow the final MemoryRegion object to be reaped when >>>> its reference count is cleared. >>>> Signed-off-by: Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org> >>>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> >>>> Message-Id: <20250410122643.1747913-2-manos.pitsidiana...@linaro.org> >>>> Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org >>>> --- >>>> include/system/memory.h | 1 + >>>> hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c | 23 ++++++++--------------- >>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >>>> diff --git a/include/system/memory.h b/include/system/memory.h >>>> index fc35a0dcad..90715ff44a 100644 >>>> --- a/include/system/memory.h >>>> +++ b/include/system/memory.h >>>> @@ -784,6 +784,7 @@ struct MemoryRegion { >>>> DeviceState *dev; >>>> const MemoryRegionOps *ops; >>>> + /* opaque data, used by backends like @ops */ >>>> void *opaque; >>>> MemoryRegion *container; >>>> int mapped_via_alias; /* Mapped via an alias, container might be >>>> NULL */ >>>> diff --git a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c >>>> index 145a0b3879..71a7500de9 100644 >>>> --- a/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c >>>> +++ b/hw/display/virtio-gpu-virgl.c >>>> @@ -52,17 +52,11 @@ virgl_get_egl_display(G_GNUC_UNUSED void *cookie) >>>> #if VIRGL_VERSION_MAJOR >= 1 >>>> struct virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region { >>>> - MemoryRegion mr; >>>> + MemoryRegion *mr; >>>> struct VirtIOGPU *g; >>>> bool finish_unmapping; >>>> }; >>>> -static struct virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region * >>>> -to_hostmem_region(MemoryRegion *mr) >>>> -{ >>>> - return container_of(mr, struct virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region, mr); >>>> -} >>>> - >>>> static void virtio_gpu_virgl_resume_cmdq_bh(void *opaque) >>>> { >>>> VirtIOGPU *g = opaque; >>>> @@ -73,14 +67,12 @@ static void virtio_gpu_virgl_resume_cmdq_bh(void >>>> *opaque) >>>> static void virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region_free(void *obj) >>>> { >>>> MemoryRegion *mr = MEMORY_REGION(obj); >>>> - struct virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region *vmr; >>>> + struct virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region *vmr = mr->opaque; >>>> VirtIOGPUBase *b; >>>> VirtIOGPUGL *gl; >>>> - vmr = to_hostmem_region(mr); >>>> - vmr->finish_unmapping = true; >>>> - >>>> b = VIRTIO_GPU_BASE(vmr->g); >>>> + vmr->finish_unmapping = true; >>>> b->renderer_blocked--; >>>> /* >>>> @@ -118,8 +110,8 @@ virtio_gpu_virgl_map_resource_blob(VirtIOGPU *g, >>>> vmr = g_new0(struct virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region, 1); >>>> vmr->g = g; >>>> + mr = g_new0(MemoryRegion, 1); >>> >>> This patch does nothing more than adding a separate allocation for >>> MemoryRegion. Besides there is no corresponding g_free(). This patch >>> can be simply dropped. >> As the patch says the MemoryRegion is now free'd when it is >> de-referenced. Do you have a test case showing it leaking? > > "De-referenced" is confusing and sounds like pointer dereferencing. > > OBJECT(mr)->free, which has virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region_free() as > its value, will be called to free mr when the references of mr are > removed. This patch however does not add a corresponding g_free() call > to virtio_gpu_virgl_hostmem_region_free(), leaking mr. > > AddressSanitizer will catch the memory leak.
Example invocation? I ran the AddressSantizier against all the virtio-gpu tests yesterday and it did not complain. > > Regards, > Akihiko Odaki -- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro