Yanfei Xu <yanfei...@bytedance.com> writes: > There won't be any ram sync after the stage of save_complete, therefore > it's unnecessary to do manually protect for dirty pages being sent. Skip > to do this in last round can reduce noticeable downtime. > > Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei...@bytedance.com> > --- > As I don't have proper machine to test this patch in qemu and verify if it has > risks like in postcopy, colo and so on.(But I tested this idea on my rust VMM, > it works and can reduce ~50ms for a 128GB guest). So I raise the patch with > RFC > for suggestions. > > migration/ram.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c > index e12913b43e..2b169cdd18 100644 > --- a/migration/ram.c > +++ b/migration/ram.c > @@ -838,7 +838,9 @@ static inline bool migration_bitmap_clear_dirty(RAMState > *rs, > * the page in the chunk we clear the remote dirty bitmap for all. > * Clearing it earlier won't be a problem, but too late will. > */ > - migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap(rb, page); > + if (!rs->last_stage) { > + migration_clear_memory_region_dirty_bitmap(rb, page); > + } > > ret = test_and_clear_bit(page, rb->bmap); > if (ret) {
Well, it looks ok to me and passes all my tests. Tested-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de>