Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org> writes: > On 5/12/25 11:39 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> PATCH 10 empties out and deletes qapi/machine-target.json. PATCH 04 >>> empties out qapi/misc-target.json without deleting it. Missing: >>> >>> * Delete qapi/misc-target.json >>> >>> * Delete entry F: qapi/machine-target.json in MAINTAINERS >>> >>> * Delete dead logic around qapi_specific_outputs in qapi/meson.build >>> >>> The latter deserves its own PATCH 11. Whether to delete the >>> qapi/*-target.json in the patch that empties the file or in PATCH 11 is >>> a matter of taste. >> >> FYI, after discussing with Pierrick, I'm going to let him take over >> work on this patch series to drive it forward to something viable >> to submit as a non-RFC.
No worries, you're passing them into capable hands. > Thanks for your work Daniel, I'll continue the effort based on your > approach. > > Just for information, I'll apply a Signed-off-by with my name to all > patches posted (including the ones I won't touch) simply because I use > git rebase --signoff by default, and don't want to have to do this > manually and selectively, as I work with a single master, with stacked > branches and update-refs. We actually expect you to add your S-o-B to patches that go through your tree whether you changed them or not.
