On 11 May 2012 13:16, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 10 May 2012 01:14, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
>> Also use cpu_reset() in place of cpu_state_reset().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de>
>
> The pxa2xx stuff is probably going to clash with the cp15
> rework, but I guess we'll sort that out when one or the
> other of these series hits master.
>
> Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

Also looks good to me.

>
> (The stuff pxa2xx.c is doing to CPUARMState is a really
> gross layering violation, incidentally.)

The code reflects what the hardware is doing though.  One could argue
that if a hardware emulator divides things into layers where the real
hardware violates those layers then the division is not fully correct.

Cheers

Reply via email to