Hi Shameer,

On 5/2/25 12:27 PM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> No functional changes intended. This will be useful when we
> add support for user-creatable smmuv3 device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.th...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/arm/virt.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index dd355f4454..464e84ae67 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -1418,19 +1418,43 @@ static void create_pcie_irq_map(const MachineState 
> *ms,
>                             0x7           /* PCI irq */);
>  }
>  
> +static void create_smmuv3_dt_bindings(const VirtMachineState *vms, hwaddr 
> base,
> +                                      hwaddr size, int irq)
> +{
> +    char *node;
> +    const char compat[] = "arm,smmu-v3";
> +    const char irq_names[] = "eventq\0priq\0cmdq-sync\0gerror";
> +    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms);
> +
> +    node = g_strdup_printf("/smmuv3@%" PRIx64, base);
> +    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(ms->fdt, node);
> +    qemu_fdt_setprop(ms->fdt, node, "compatible", compat, sizeof(compat));
> +    qemu_fdt_setprop_sized_cells(ms->fdt, node, "reg", 2, base, 2, size);
> +
> +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(ms->fdt, node, "interrupts",
> +            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq    , GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI,
> +            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq + 1, GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI,
> +            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq + 2, GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI,
> +            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq + 3, GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI);
> +
> +    qemu_fdt_setprop(ms->fdt, node, "interrupt-names", irq_names,
> +                     sizeof(irq_names));
> +
> +    qemu_fdt_setprop(ms->fdt, node, "dma-coherent", NULL, 0);
> +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(ms->fdt, node, "#iommu-cells", 1);
> +    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(ms->fdt, node, "phandle", vms->iommu_phandle);
> +    g_free(node);
> +}
> +
>  static void create_smmu(const VirtMachineState *vms,
>                          PCIBus *bus)
>  {
>      VirtMachineClass *vmc = VIRT_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(vms);
> -    char *node;
> -    const char compat[] = "arm,smmu-v3";
>      int irq =  vms->irqmap[VIRT_SMMU];
>      int i;
>      hwaddr base = vms->memmap[VIRT_SMMU].base;
>      hwaddr size = vms->memmap[VIRT_SMMU].size;
> -    const char irq_names[] = "eventq\0priq\0cmdq-sync\0gerror";
>      DeviceState *dev;
> -    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms);
>  
>      if (vms->iommu != VIRT_IOMMU_SMMUV3 || !vms->iommu_phandle) {
>          return;
> @@ -1449,27 +1473,7 @@ static void create_smmu(const VirtMachineState *vms,
>          sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), i,
>                             qdev_get_gpio_in(vms->gic, irq + i));
>      }
> -
> -    node = g_strdup_printf("/smmuv3@%" PRIx64, base);
> -    qemu_fdt_add_subnode(ms->fdt, node);
> -    qemu_fdt_setprop(ms->fdt, node, "compatible", compat, sizeof(compat));
> -    qemu_fdt_setprop_sized_cells(ms->fdt, node, "reg", 2, base, 2, size);
> -
> -    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(ms->fdt, node, "interrupts",
> -            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq    , GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI,
> -            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq + 1, GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI,
> -            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq + 2, GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI,
> -            GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_SPI, irq + 3, GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_EDGE_LO_HI);
> -
> -    qemu_fdt_setprop(ms->fdt, node, "interrupt-names", irq_names,
> -                     sizeof(irq_names));
> -
> -    qemu_fdt_setprop(ms->fdt, node, "dma-coherent", NULL, 0);
> -
> -    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(ms->fdt, node, "#iommu-cells", 1);
> -
> -    qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(ms->fdt, node, "phandle", vms->iommu_phandle);
> -    g_free(node);
> +    create_smmuv3_dt_bindings(vms, base, size, irq);
>  }
>  
>  static void create_virtio_iommu_dt_bindings(VirtMachineState *vms)
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>

nothing to do with that patch but I just noticed we omitted to support the

bypass_iommu=true along with DT mode. I don't see the iommu-map property set 
accordingly.

Something to further consolidate?

Eric


Eric


Reply via email to