From: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@fujitsu.com> Since we have disabled RDMA + postcopy, it's safe to remove the migration_in_postcopy() that follows the migrate_rdma().
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <20250305062825.772629-5-lizhij...@fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de> --- migration/rdma.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c index b31652baac..a3c3b432d1 100644 --- a/migration/rdma.c +++ b/migration/rdma.c @@ -3284,7 +3284,7 @@ err: int rdma_control_save_page(QEMUFile *f, ram_addr_t block_offset, ram_addr_t offset, size_t size) { - if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) { + if (!migrate_rdma()) { return RAM_SAVE_CONTROL_NOT_SUPP; } @@ -3829,7 +3829,7 @@ int rdma_block_notification_handle(QEMUFile *f, const char *name) int rdma_registration_start(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) { - if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) { + if (!migrate_rdma()) { return 0; } @@ -3861,7 +3861,7 @@ int rdma_registration_stop(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags) RDMAControlHeader head = { .len = 0, .repeat = 1 }; int ret; - if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) { + if (!migrate_rdma()) { return 0; } -- 2.48.1