From: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@fujitsu.com>

Since we have disabled RDMA + postcopy, it's safe to remove
the migration_in_postcopy() that follows the migrate_rdma().

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <20250305062825.772629-5-lizhij...@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <faro...@suse.de>
---
 migration/rdma.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
index b31652baac..a3c3b432d1 100644
--- a/migration/rdma.c
+++ b/migration/rdma.c
@@ -3284,7 +3284,7 @@ err:
 int rdma_control_save_page(QEMUFile *f, ram_addr_t block_offset,
                            ram_addr_t offset, size_t size)
 {
-    if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) {
+    if (!migrate_rdma()) {
         return RAM_SAVE_CONTROL_NOT_SUPP;
     }
 
@@ -3829,7 +3829,7 @@ int rdma_block_notification_handle(QEMUFile *f, const 
char *name)
 
 int rdma_registration_start(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags)
 {
-    if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) {
+    if (!migrate_rdma()) {
         return 0;
     }
 
@@ -3861,7 +3861,7 @@ int rdma_registration_stop(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t flags)
     RDMAControlHeader head = { .len = 0, .repeat = 1 };
     int ret;
 
-    if (!migrate_rdma() || migration_in_postcopy()) {
+    if (!migrate_rdma()) {
         return 0;
     }
 
-- 
2.48.1


Reply via email to