Am 10.05.2012 23:26, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 10 May 2012 22:05, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: >> This series is put together in such a way that it achieves a goal: >> removing cpu_state_reset(). I can send you these and more patches >> refactoring ARM devices but then it'll be perceived as "just churn". >> 74 sounds like much, but the patches are pretty easy to review, no? >> These 74 are a subset of a currently 138-patch series and growing - >> that's why agreeing on a merge order for qom-next is so important to me. >> >> If I send these out in series of 5 patches and wait for each to get >> merged through different trees then by the current rate of applying >> this'll take years, especially if we're blocked by unmaintained targets... > > If you just want a reviewed-by from me and to put the whole series in > to the tree via some other route that's also fine by me.
That's the main request, yes, as done by Michael for v1. :) /-F -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
