Il lun 28 apr 2025, 14:58 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> ha scritto:
> On 28/4/25 13:05, Alex Bennée wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The KVM/QEMU community call is at: > > > > https://meet.jit.si/kvmcallmeeting > > @ > > 29/04/2025 14:00 UTC > > > > Are there any agenda items for the sync-up? > > > > For single binary / heterogeneous emulation, we'd like QAPI to > be "feature-agnostic". In particular, using the example of KVM > accelerator, whether a binary can run with it built-in or not > should be is irrelevant for management applications: they should > only check if it is used (enabled). > > The following series is adding KVM specific structures and commands: > > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20250409082649.14733-2-zhao1....@intel.com/ > It could be interesting to discuss if this can be avoided. But this > can also be discussed on the mailing list (as it is still currently). > Would it be possible to just mark the commands as "do not autoregister" and then do the registration (for example) at machine/accelerator/CPU creation? I think qemu-ga already has a similar run-time registration model but I don't know why QEMU does not use it. Paolo >
