Il mar 29 apr 2025, 14:17 Magnus Kulke <magnusku...@linux.microsoft.com> ha
scritto:

> Yes, I'm using the generalized emulator in the context of adding the MSHV
> accelerator. (I'll probably get around sending an RFC patchset this week
> for
> it). There were minor compilation issues w/ the emulator code, that I had
> to
> fix to make it compile on Linux. However I don't have access to an x86_64
> Mac for development either, so I can't test a HVF build.
>

No problem, using MSHV to test if I am breaking anything in the emulator is
enough!

Paolo

Best,
>
> Magnus
>
> > ---
> > >  target/i386/emulate/x86_decode.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/emulate/x86_decode.c
> > > b/target/i386/emulate/x86_decode.c
> > > index 7fee219687..7efa2f570e 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/emulate/x86_decode.c
> > > +++ b/target/i386/emulate/x86_decode.c
> > > @@ -1408,7 +1408,7 @@ struct decode_tbl _2op_inst[] = {
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  struct decode_x87_tbl invl_inst_x87 = {0x0, 0, 0, 0, 0, false, false,
> > > NULL,
> > > -                                       NULL, decode_invalid, 0};
> > > +                                       NULL, decode_invalid};
> > >
> > >  struct decode_x87_tbl _x87_inst[] = {
> > >      {0xd8, 0, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_FADD, 10, false, false,
> > > @@ -1456,8 +1456,7 @@ struct decode_x87_tbl _x87_inst[] = {
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_st0, NULL, decode_d9_4},
> > >      {0xd9, 4, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 4, false, false,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_bytep, NULL, NULL},
> > > -    {0xd9, 5, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_FLDxx, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL,
> > > -     RFLAGS_MASK_NONE},
> > > +    {0xd9, 5, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_FLDxx, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> > > NULL},
> > >      {0xd9, 5, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_FLDCW, 2, false, false,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_bytep, NULL, NULL},
> > >
> > > @@ -1478,20 +1477,17 @@ struct decode_x87_tbl _x87_inst[] = {
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_st0, NULL},
> > >      {0xda, 3, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_FCMOV, 10, false, false,
> > > decode_x87_modrm_st0,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_st0, NULL},
> > > -    {0xda, 4, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL,
> > > -     RFLAGS_MASK_NONE},
> > > +    {0xda, 4, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL},
> > >      {0xda, 4, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_FSUB, 4, false, false,
> > > decode_x87_modrm_st0,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_intp, NULL},
> > >      {0xda, 5, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_FUCOM, 10, false, true,
> > > decode_x87_modrm_st0,
> > >       decode_decode_x87_modrm_st0, NULL},
> > >      {0xda, 5, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_FSUB, 4, true, false,
> > > decode_x87_modrm_st0,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_intp, NULL},
> > > -    {0xda, 6, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL,
> > > -     RFLAGS_MASK_NONE},
> > > +    {0xda, 6, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL},
> > >      {0xda, 6, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_FDIV, 4, false, false,
> > > decode_x87_modrm_st0,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_intp, NULL},
> > > -    {0xda, 7, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL,
> > > -     RFLAGS_MASK_NONE},
> > > +    {0xda, 7, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL},
> > >      {0xda, 7, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_FDIV, 4, true, false,
> > > decode_x87_modrm_st0,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_intp, NULL},
> > >
> > > @@ -1511,8 +1507,7 @@ struct decode_x87_tbl _x87_inst[] = {
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_intp, NULL, NULL},
> > >      {0xdb, 4, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> > >       decode_db_4},
> > > -    {0xdb, 4, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL,
> > > -     RFLAGS_MASK_NONE},
> > > +    {0xdb, 4, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_INVL, 10, false, false, NULL, NULL,
> NULL},
> > >      {0xdb, 5, 3, X86_DECODE_CMD_FUCOMI, 10, false, false,
> > >       decode_x87_modrm_st0, decode_x87_modrm_st0, NULL},
> > >      {0xdb, 5, 0, X86_DECODE_CMD_FLD, 10, false, false,
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> > >
>
>

Reply via email to