On 10.05.2012 11:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/05/2012 18:54, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
>> And in case kvm is enabled, and we run on some other CPU
>> (not intel and not amd), we'll have some other CPU model,
>> which might exist or might not, which may make some sense
>> or may not, etc - we simple don't know.
> 
> Leaving aside the discussions on TCG, yes, this makes no sense for kvm.
>  You should use kvm32 and kvm64 instead.

In that case the question turns into a different one: why qemu64
is default with -enable-kvm?  Either way it makes no sense at all,
and that's whole my point.

/mjt

Reply via email to