On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 09:52:12AM -0700, Yuanchu Xie wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 2:39 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:20:11PM +0000, T.J. Alumbaugh wrote: > > > This is the device implementation for the proposed expanded balloon > > > feature > > > described here: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230509185419.1088297-1-yuan...@google.com/ > > > > > > This series has a fixed number of "bins" for the working set report, but > > > this is > > > not a constraint of the system. The bin number is fixed at device > > > realization > > > time (in other implementations it is specified as a command line > > > argument). Once > > > that number is fixed, this determines the correct number of bin intervals > > > to > > > pass to the QMP/HMP function 'working_set_config'. Any feedback on how to > > > properly construct that function for this use case (passing a variable > > > length > > > list?) would be appreciated. > > > > It's been a while. Is there interest is reviving this? I also note that > > reserving a feature bit is very much recommended to avoid a complete > > mess. > Thanks for the reminder Michael! I've been informed [1] that this > should be brought up in VIRTIO TC, but I haven't gotten around to this > yet. Should I send a patch to this mailing list or a proposal to > virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org to reserve a feature bit? > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20241127025728.3689245-10-yuan...@google.com/
You can do this in any order. -- MST
