On 18/03/2025 09:53, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> This routine is only used in file "migration.c". Move it there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>

> ---
>  include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h | 1 -
>  hw/vfio/common.c              | 6 ------
>  hw/vfio/migration.c           | 5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
> index 
> 5f082e5a321d97e90066d48cd3c1eaad56912ccb..0aae88131cffda1a90b8ccd0224387133c0fa83a
>  100644
> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
> @@ -290,7 +290,6 @@ extern VFIODeviceList vfio_device_list;
>  extern const MemoryListener vfio_memory_listener;
>  extern int vfio_kvm_device_fd;
>  
> -bool vfio_viommu_preset(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
>  bool vfio_device_state_is_running(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
>  bool vfio_device_state_is_precopy(VFIODevice *vbasedev);
>  
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
> index 
> ace7a4403bd49f35cf85009015b3ba315f80cd30..0b9b071cd0490867bb6aa4ceb261350ccd6e1125
>  100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/common.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
> @@ -65,12 +65,6 @@ int vfio_kvm_device_fd = -1;
>   * Device state interfaces
>   */
>  
> -
> -bool vfio_viommu_preset(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
> -{
> -    return vbasedev->bcontainer->space->as != &address_space_memory;
> -}
> -
>  static void vfio_set_migration_error(int ret)
>  {
>      if (migration_is_running()) {
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/migration.c b/hw/vfio/migration.c
> index 
> 951e073a20287c46ca199b1648782b59415d0d2a..a1ba993ce549fce0d2a9a60ba07d4782c87c0c09
>  100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/migration.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/migration.c
> @@ -1141,6 +1141,11 @@ bool vfio_mig_active(void)
>      return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool vfio_viommu_preset(VFIODevice *vbasedev)
> +{
> +    return vbasedev->bcontainer->space->as != &address_space_memory;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Return true when either migration initialized or blocker registered.
>   * Currently only return false when adding blocker fails which will


Reply via email to