On 25/03/25 20:08, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 3/25/25 12:23, Aditya Gupta wrote:
Power11 core is same as Power10, reuse PNV10_PSI initialisation, by
declaring 'PNV11_PSI' as child class of 'PNV10_PSI'
Cc: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org>
Cc: Frédéric Barrat <fbar...@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mah...@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org>
I am removing this Rb.
Got it, I will take care in v7.
<...snip...>
@@ -937,6 +937,29 @@ static const TypeInfo pnv_psi_power10_info = {
.name = TYPE_PNV10_PSI,
.parent = TYPE_PNV9_PSI,
.class_init = pnv_psi_power10_class_init,
+ .class_base_init = pnv_psi_power10_class_init,
why change class_base_init ?
This was since I was keeping the P10 types as child of P11.
And for them to follow the same init, I found the .class_base_init to be
a good option.
Based on your suggestion on Homer patch, I am thinking to drop these
patches and just use p10 models.
Thanks,
- Aditya Gupta
Thanks,
C.
