Hi Richard,
On 8/3/25 23:58, Richard Henderson wrote:
Some of these bits are actually common to all cpus; while the
reset have common reservations for target-specific usage.
While generic code cannot know what the target-specific usage is,
common code can know what to do with the bits, e.g. single-step.
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
---
include/exec/cpu-all.h | 53 +--------------------------
include/exec/cpu-interrupt.h | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/exec/poison.h | 13 -------
3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/exec/cpu-interrupt.h
diff --git a/include/exec/poison.h b/include/exec/poison.h
index 35721366d7..8ed04b3108 100644
--- a/include/exec/poison.h
+++ b/include/exec/poison.h
@@ -46,19 +46,6 @@
#pragma GCC poison TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_DEBUG
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_0
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_1
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_2
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_3
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_4
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_INT_0
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_INT_1
-#pragma GCC poison CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_INT_2
If I understood correctly yesterday's discussion, these
definitions are internal to target/ and shouldn't be used
by hw/ at all. If this is right, then we need to keep them
poisoned for hw/ code.
