On 18/3/25 22:31, Richard Henderson wrote:
These need to be per-target for 'abi_ptr'.  Expand inline to
the *_data_ra api with ra == 0.

Reviewed-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
---
  include/exec/cpu_ldst.h     | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  accel/tcg/ldst_common.c.inc |  89 --------------------------
  2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h b/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h
index a2a90c7554..d084da0b5f 100644
--- a/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h
+++ b/include/exec/cpu_ldst.h
@@ -74,25 +74,6 @@
  #include "user/guest-host.h"
  #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
-uint32_t cpu_ldub_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-int cpu_ldsb_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-uint32_t cpu_lduw_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-int cpu_ldsw_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-uint32_t cpu_ldl_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-uint64_t cpu_ldq_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-uint32_t cpu_lduw_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-int cpu_ldsw_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-uint32_t cpu_ldl_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-uint64_t cpu_ldq_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr);
-
-void cpu_stb_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr, uint32_t val);
-void cpu_stw_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr, uint32_t val);
-void cpu_stl_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr, uint32_t val);
-void cpu_stq_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr, uint64_t val);
-void cpu_stw_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr, uint32_t val);
-void cpu_stl_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr, uint32_t val);
-void cpu_stq_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr ptr, uint64_t val);
-
  static inline uint32_t
  cpu_ldub_mmuidx_ra(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, int mmu_idx, uintptr_t ra)
  {
@@ -342,6 +323,110 @@ cpu_stq_le_data_ra(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, 
uint64_t val, uintptr_t ra)
      cpu_stq_le_mmuidx_ra(env, addr, val, mmu_index, ra);
  }
+/*--------------------------*/
+
+static inline uint32_t

Pre-existing, but why don't we use 'unsigned int' like for the signed
variants, or the plain int8_t type?

+cpu_ldub_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return cpu_ldub_data_ra(env, addr, 0);
+}
+
+static inline int
+cpu_ldsb_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return (int8_t)cpu_ldub_data(env, addr);
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t
+cpu_lduw_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return cpu_lduw_be_data_ra(env, addr, 0);
+}
+
+static inline int
+cpu_ldsw_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return (int16_t)cpu_lduw_be_data(env, addr);
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t
+cpu_ldl_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return cpu_ldl_be_data_ra(env, addr, 0);
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t
+cpu_ldq_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return cpu_ldq_be_data_ra(env, addr, 0);
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t
+cpu_lduw_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return cpu_lduw_le_data_ra(env, addr, 0);
+}
+
+static inline int
+cpu_ldsw_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return (int16_t)cpu_lduw_le_data(env, addr);
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t
+cpu_ldl_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return cpu_ldl_le_data_ra(env, addr, 0);
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t
+cpu_ldq_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr)
+{
+    return cpu_ldq_le_data_ra(env, addr, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void
+cpu_stb_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, uint32_t val)
+{
+    cpu_stb_data_ra(env, addr, val, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void
+cpu_stw_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, uint32_t val)
+{
+    cpu_stw_be_data_ra(env, addr, val, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void
+cpu_stl_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, uint32_t val)
+{
+    cpu_stl_be_data_ra(env, addr, val, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void
+cpu_stq_be_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, uint64_t val)
+{
+    cpu_stq_be_data_ra(env, addr, val, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void
+cpu_stw_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, uint32_t val)
+{
+    cpu_stw_le_data_ra(env, addr, val, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void
+cpu_stl_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, uint32_t val)
+{
+    cpu_stl_le_data_ra(env, addr, val, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void
+cpu_stq_le_data(CPUArchState *env, abi_ptr addr, uint64_t val)
+{
+    cpu_stq_le_data_ra(env, addr, val, 0);
+}


Reply via email to