On 3/18/25 10:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 17:42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> wrote:
On 18/3/25 05:51, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Directly condition associated calls in target/arm/helper.c for now.
Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier <pierrick.bouv...@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 8 --------
target/arm/helper.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 51b6428cfec..9205cbdec43 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1222,7 +1222,6 @@ int arm_cpu_write_elf32_note(WriteCoreDumpFunction f,
CPUState *cs,
*/
void arm_emulate_firmware_reset(CPUState *cpustate, int target_el);
-#ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
int aarch64_cpu_gdb_read_register(CPUState *cpu, GByteArray *buf, int reg);
int aarch64_cpu_gdb_write_register(CPUState *cpu, uint8_t *buf, int reg);
void aarch64_sve_narrow_vq(CPUARMState *env, unsigned vq);
@@ -1254,13 +1253,6 @@ static inline uint64_t *sve_bswap64(uint64_t *dst,
uint64_t *src, int nr)
#endif
}
-#else
-static inline void aarch64_sve_narrow_vq(CPUARMState *env, unsigned vq) { }
-static inline void aarch64_sve_change_el(CPUARMState *env, int o,
- int n, bool a)
-{ }
-#endif
-
void aarch64_sync_32_to_64(CPUARMState *env);
void aarch64_sync_64_to_32(CPUARMState *env);
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index b46b2bffcf3..774e1ee0245 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6562,7 +6562,9 @@ static void zcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const
ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
*/
new_len = sve_vqm1_for_el(env, cur_el);
if (new_len < old_len) {
+#ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
What about using runtime check instead?
if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64) && new_len < old_len) {
That would be a dead check: it is not possible to get here
unless ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64 is set.
We can then assert it, to make sure there is no regression around that.
We now have another conversation and something to decide in another
file, and that's why I chose to do the minimal change ("ifdef the
issue") instead of trying to do any change.
thanks
-- PMM