On Thu Mar 13, 2025 at 8:49 PM AEST, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 13/3/25 07:13, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 13/03/2025 03.34, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 8:59 PM Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit 
>>>> 825b96dbcee23d134b691fc75618b59c5f53da32:
>>>>
>>>>    Merge tag 'migration-20250310-pull-request' of https://gitlab.com/ 
>>>> farosas/qemu into staging (2025-03-11 09:32:07 +0800)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>    https://gitlab.com/npiggin/qemu.git tags/pull-ppc-for-10.0-1-20250311
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 0f17ae24b53eaab4bbe9cfab267c536e2f7fdbd7:
>>>>
>>>>    docs/system/ppc/amigang.rst: Update for NVRAM emulation 
>>>> (2025-03-11 22:43:32 +1000)
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> * amigaone enhancements, NVRAM and kernel/initrd support
>>>> * Next round of XIVE group/crowd changes
>>>> * SPI updates for powernv
>>>> * Power10 2nd DAWR support for powernv and spapr
>>>> * powernv HOMER/OCC fixes and improvements for power management
>>>> * powernv PNOR support
>>>> * Big cleanup to move TCG code under ifdef or into its own file
>>>> * Update SLOF and skiboot ROMs
>>>> * Remove 405 boards and deprecate 405 CPU
>>>> * Add support for nested KVM "hostwide state" data.
>>>
>>> I fixed a CI failure on FreeBSD 14 hosts because of the __packed macro
>>> redefinition in hw/ppc/pnv_occ.c:
>>> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/9388495246#L5857
>>>
>>> Here is my fix in the merge commit, if you prefer a different fix,
>>> please send a follow-up commit:
>>> diff --git i/hw/ppc/pnv_occ.c w/hw/ppc/pnv_occ.c
>>> index d9ce35a4d6..bda6b23ad3 100644
>>> --- i/hw/ppc/pnv_occ.c
>>> +++ w/hw/ppc/pnv_occ.c
>>> @@ -394,7 +394,9 @@ type_init(pnv_occ_register_types);
>>>   #define s64 int64_t
>>>   #define __be16 uint16_t
>>>   #define __be32 uint32_t
>>> +#ifndef __packed
>>>   #define __packed QEMU_PACKED
>>> +#endif /* !__packed */
>> 
>> We should never define such macros in userspace - everything with two 
>> underscores at the beginning is reserved for the system and the compiler 
>> and must not be created by the userspace code.
>> Why doesn't this code use QEMU_PACKED directly instead?
>
> Similar question with __be16 / __be32.

Okay these were just because the type definition is taken from
skiboot firmware, so I added those defs just in the .c file to
make it a bit less change. It's not too much to change if that
is preferred.

Thanks,
Nick

Reply via email to