On 3/10/25 10:47, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Maybe better as

      MemOp mop = (target_words_bigendian() ? MO_BE : MO_LE) | size_memop(size);
      adjust_endianness(mr, &mrfd.data, size_memop(size), mop);


Do you think defining MO_TE as this expression is a good idea?

There are not so many references to MO_TE outside target/ or accel/tcg/.

Indeed, after this change, the only ones left are in hw/arm/armv7m.c,
which (because it's Arm) can be changed to MO_LE.


r~

Reply via email to