On 3/10/25 10:47, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Maybe better asMemOp mop = (target_words_bigendian() ? MO_BE : MO_LE) | size_memop(size); adjust_endianness(mr, &mrfd.data, size_memop(size), mop);Do you think defining MO_TE as this expression is a good idea?
There are not so many references to MO_TE outside target/ or accel/tcg/. Indeed, after this change, the only ones left are in hw/arm/armv7m.c, which (because it's Arm) can be changed to MO_LE. r~