+Edgar On Wed, 5 Mar 2025, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 16/6/23 01:52, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > From: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garh...@amd.com> > > > > Add a new machine xenpvh which creates a IOREQ server to register/connect > > with > > Xen Hypervisor. > > > > Optional: When CONFIG_TPM is enabled, it also creates a tpm-tis-device, adds > > a > > TPM emulator and connects to swtpm running on host machine via chardev > > socket > > and support TPM functionalities for a guest domain. > > > > Extra command line for aarch64 xenpvh QEMU to connect to swtpm: > > -chardev socket,id=chrtpm,path=/tmp/myvtpm2/swtpm-sock \ > > -tpmdev emulator,id=tpm0,chardev=chrtpm \ > > -machine tpm-base-addr=0x0c000000 \ > > > > swtpm implements a TPM software emulator(TPM 1.2 & TPM 2) built on libtpms > > and > > provides access to TPM functionality over socket, chardev and CUSE > > interface. > > Github repo: https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm > > Example for starting swtpm on host machine: > > mkdir /tmp/vtpm2 > > swtpm socket --tpmstate dir=/tmp/vtpm2 \ > > --ctrl type=unixio,path=/tmp/vtpm2/swtpm-sock & > > > > Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garh...@amd.com> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@amd.com> > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org> > > --- > > docs/system/arm/xenpvh.rst | 34 +++++++ > > docs/system/target-arm.rst | 1 + > > hw/arm/meson.build | 2 + > > hw/arm/xen_arm.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/hw/arm/xen_arch_hvm.h | 9 ++ > > include/hw/xen/arch_hvm.h | 2 + > > 6 files changed, 229 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 docs/system/arm/xenpvh.rst > > create mode 100644 hw/arm/xen_arm.c > > create mode 100644 include/hw/arm/xen_arch_hvm.h > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/xen/arch_hvm.h b/include/hw/xen/arch_hvm.h > > index 26674648d8..c7c515220d 100644 > > --- a/include/hw/xen/arch_hvm.h > > +++ b/include/hw/xen/arch_hvm.h > > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > > #if defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_X86_64) > > #include "hw/i386/xen_arch_hvm.h" > > +#elif defined(TARGET_ARM) || defined(TARGET_ARM_64) > > I suppose this is a typo and you meant TARGET_AARCH64 :) > Luckily TARGET_AARCH64 defines TARGET_ARM.
Hi Philippe, it looks like this is an older patch. Edgar, is this patch still valid?
