On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:32 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
<dbarb...@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In this version I rolled back on the riscv_cpu_reset_hold() changes made
> in patch 1. Peter made an argument about keeping the design the same
> across architectures and I agreed. Patches 2 and 3 are already taking
> care of everything that KVM needs during reset, thus this doesn't incur
> in any functional changes.
>
> Drew said it was ok to keep his ack on patch 1 so his ack is kept.
>
> Patches based on alistair/riscv-to-apply.next. All patches acked.
>
> Changes from v2:
> - patch 1:
>   - do not do an early exit in riscv_cpu_reset_hold() if kvm_enabled()
> - v2 link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-riscv/20250221122623.495188-1-dbarb...@ventanamicro.com/
>
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (3):
>   target/riscv/cpu: remove unneeded !kvm_enabled() check
>   target/riscv/kvm: add kvm_riscv_reset_regs_csr()
>   target/riscv/kvm: add missing KVM CSRs

Thanks!

Applied to riscv-to-apply.next

Alistair

>
>  target/riscv/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>

Reply via email to