Hi Eric, >-----Original Message----- >From: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv2 09/20] intel_iommu: Rename >vtd_ce_get_rid2pasid_entry to vtd_ce_get_pasid_entry > >Hi Zhenzhong, > > >On 2/19/25 9:22 AM, Zhenzhong Duan wrote: >> In early days vtd_ce_get_rid2pasid_entry() is used to get pasid entry of >is/was
Will do. >> rid2pasid, then extend to any pasid. So a new name vtd_ce_get_pasid_entry >then it was extended to get any pasid entry? Will do. >> is better to match its functions. >to match what it actually does? Yes, will do. > >I do not know the vtd spec very well so I searched for rid2pasid and I >did not find any reference. I think I understand what is the pasid entry >from the pasid table though so the renaming does make sense to me. In spec it's named RID_PASID, copied some desc: "Requests-without-PASID processed through this scalable-mode context entry are treated as Requests-with-PASID with PASID value specified in this field. ExecuteRequested field is treated as 0 for such requests." Thanks Zhenzhong
