On 1 May 2012 21:48, Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Legacy properties != static properties. > > qdev_add_properties adds both legacy and static properties. I'm happy to > put static properties into object but not legacy properties.
So, er, how are you defining legacy and static properties? I would have thought 'legacy property' was 'anything we happen to already have'... > Base classes are free to call object_property_add_static directly and avoid > qdev_add_properties entirely but we need the later for backwards compat. If qdev_add_properties is purely for back-compat it should be clearly labelled so we don't use it in new code. -- PMM
